amazon-music-prime-members-new-features-feat.jpg

Amazon Music Prime Members Get ‘All-Access Playlists’

Amazon Music Prime is adding a few new features to the list for its ‘free’ version for those who already pay for a Prime membership. Here’s the latest.

Amazon says it is adding more on-demand features to give listeners more control over their experience. In addition to listening to the entire 100 million+ track catalog in shuffle mode, Prime members can now create ‘All Access’ playlists. Create a playlist with your favorite songs and listen with unlimited skips and offline.

Users can also convert existing playlists into All-Access playlists. It needs to have at least fifteen songs with a maximum of 50 to be eligible. Here’s a quick guide on how to convert a playlist to All-Access for Prime members:

  1. Go to your playlists in your music library.
  2. Select the playlist you want as ‘All-Access’.
  3. Switch the ‘All-Access’ playlist toggle to ‘ON.’

Amazon says Prime members may only have one of their personal playlists designated as an All-Access at any given time. Amazon curates a selection of 15 other playlists with the ‘All-Access’ title that are matched to a user’s listening tastes and history. These playlists include ‘My Recent Plays,’ ‘My Frequent Plays,’ and ‘Trending For You.’

Amazon is also introducing a new All-Access playlist called ‘My Mix’ that refreshes daily, reflecting a user’s unique listening habits and preferences. Listening to at least 25 tracks on Amazon Music will unlock the ‘My Mix’ playlist for users to interact with. As they continue listening, this playlist will evolve with their listening history.

The company says it will also make a selection of new albums from top artists available on demand for a limited time. A new section titled ‘On-Demand Albums This Week’ includes the selection of artists’ albums that are free to listen to in the Amazon Music Prime app. It’s a great way for artists to get exposure to Amazon’s growing crowd of free listeners.


Source link

netflix-secret-codes.jpg

How to Use the Hidden Search Feature

There’s something exciting about a secret menu. It’s that knowledge that you know some insider information that others might not, and maybe that gives you some sort of advantage. Well, the same can be said for Netflix, which, if you didn’t know, has a bunch of secret codes you can play around with.

Now, Netflix’s secret codes have been pretty well documented up until this point, so they might not be as secret as they once were. However, what you might not have known is that new codes are being added to Netflix all the time.

As per a blog on Tudum earlier this year, Netflix’s secret category codes date back to the very early days of the company and now span a list of over 36,000 different options.

How do Netflix’s secret codes work?

netflix logo on tv

If you’re new to Netflix’s category codes, allow us to spill the secrets. To check them out, all you need to do is first have a Netflix account, then open Netflix on your web browser, type in “netflix.com.au/browse/genre” and then add the ID code of your choice at the end.

Hitting enter will bring you up with some very specific search results, helping you browse through Netflix’s extensive catalogue and find the niche of your choice.

Note that this is for browser use only and won’t work on your Netflix apps.

What are some of the best codes to check out?

dystopian netflix movies
Images: Warner Bros/Netflix/Lionsgate

According to Tudum, new Netflix codes are added “whenever inspiration strikes” meaning new ones show up all the time. Some themes, like Human Connections, popped up due to the melancholy folks felt during COVID, while others are timed around a holiday or celebration.

Here are some of the latest and greatest secret Netflix codes you can check out now, as recommended by Netflix’s curators:

  • 90-Minute Movies – 81466194
  • 30-Minute laughs – 81602050
  • Binge-Worthy British Crime TV Shows – 1192582
  • Chosen Family – 81231348
  • Cyberpunk – 1964512
  • Dystopian Futures – 2299461
  • Don’t Watch Hungry – 3272152
  • Family Movie Night – 2013975
  • Gal-Pal TV Shows – 1143288
  • High Brow Horror – 3261672
  • Irreverent TV Comedies – 75480
  • K-Dramas for Beginners – 2953105
  • Movies Directed by Women – 2974953
  • Pop Culture Icons – 81278963
  • Reluctant Adults – 3053870
  • Relentless Crime Thrillers – 81226732
  • Schemers & Scammers – 81493295
  • Small Town Charm – 81615585
  • Supernatural Soaps – 81238162
  • Swipe Right – 81582488
  • Take a Trip Around the World – 81282911
  • Team Players – 2752022
  • Totally Awesome ’80s – 2314106
  • Watch in One Weekend – 3182735

There are also some more general Netflix secret codes that are worth knowing about, such as:

  • Your full Continue Watching page: netflix.com.au/browse/continue-watching
  • Hidden gems for you: netflix.com.au/browse/hidden-gems
  • A list of what’s currently trending on Netflix: netflix.com.au/browse/trending-now
  • New and popular (displays the top 10 on Netflix and what’s coming soon): netflix.com.au/browse/latest

If you’re obsessed with one particular show and are looking for more, another useful Netflix code is to find titles that are similar. You can do this by finding the series ID of the show you like (which is the number in the browser URL while on the landing page of said show) and then typing in: netflix.com.au/browse/similars/(insert series Netflix ID)

There really is a secret Netflix code for everything.

Have you found any good ones during your time on Netflix? Shout them out in the comments so others can check them out.




Source link

prime-big-deals-day.jpg

Everything You Need To Know About Prime Big Deals Day

CHARLOTTE, N.C. – Prime Big Deals Day starts Tuesday, October 10th through Wednesday, October 11th.

Prime Big Deals Days is the second largest Amazon sale of the year next to Prime Day. We’re just a few days away from great deals! Amazon’s products will be on sale with tremendous discounts across all categories including tech, home, beauty, furniture, and much more.

 

Prime Big Deals Day

For customers wanting a head start, sales begin as early as 3 a.m. on Tuesday, October 10th, and continue through Wednesday, October 11th until 12. a.m.

Who’s Eligible?

Amazon Big Prime Deals are eligible only to Amazon Prime members. Luckily, there are ways to get in on the discount action if you are not currently a Prime member.

Here’s How:

Sign up for a 30-day free trial, or if you are a student between the ages of 18-24 you are eligible for a 6-month Prime Student trial. Customers ready to sign on to Amazon Prime can click here to sign up for a full subscription.

Get a headstart with Amazon Prime deals here. 




Source link

76047513-12582023-image-a-9_1696193594271.jpg

How Anna Sorokin’s reinventing herself all over again: Four…

Amid the hundreds of catwalk shows making up this year’s New York Fashion Week was one which, despite its somewhat down-at-heel location, has become the talk of the town.

Held on the rain-swept rooftop of an unremarkable East Village apartment block, all eyes were fixed, not so much on the models wearing outfits by emerging U.S. designer Shao Yang but, rather, on the 32-year-old woman hosting the event at her cramped, rented home, while sporting an electronic ankle tag.

Step forward Anna Sorokin, the notorious Russian fraudster who inspired last year’s hit Netflix series Inventing Anna and who, despite being under house arrest while facing deportation, has undergone an extraordinary transformation of late.

Gone are the demure, monotone court-room outfits and heavy spectacles she wore while on trial in 2019 for £245,000 of financial crimes after conning her way into New York’s art world.

In their place are glamorous designer clothes, sultry make-up and killer heels as the former jailbird attempts — to the horror of those she defrauded — to reinvent herself once more.

Anna Sorokin, who was was jailed in 2019 (pictured), has undergone an extraordinary transformation of late

Anna Sorokin, who was was jailed in 2019 (pictured), has undergone an extraordinary transformation of late

Sorokin hosted a fashion event at her cramped, rented home, while sporting an electronic ankle tag

Sorokin hosted a fashion event at her cramped, rented home, while sporting an electronic ankle tag

Anna Sorokin, under house arrest, co-hosted a New York Fashion Week runway show on her rooftop with clothing by fashion designer Shao Yang. Pictured: Anna Sorokin with Kelly Cutrone

Anna Sorokin, under house arrest, co-hosted a New York Fashion Week runway show on her rooftop with clothing by fashion designer Shao Yang. Pictured: Anna Sorokin with Kelly Cutrone

Certainly, the convicted swindler, who posed as a German heiress with a multi-million-dollar trust fund to defraud others, is not short on her trademark chutzpah.

The ‘Danger Zone’ fashion show held above her Lower East Side apartment last month — as she exclusively revealed to the Mail last week — is just the latest in a string of high-profile media events and business ventures launched as she continues to fight for the right to remain in the U.S.

‘I definitely regret the choices I’ve made in the past,’ Sorokin said on the phone from the one-bedroom New York apartment where she is confined for 24 hours a day, apart from her weekly outing to see her parole officer at U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

Speaking in her instantly identifiable accent — a hotchpotch of U.S., German and Russian inflections mimicked by actress Julia Garner, who played her in Inventing Anna — she added: ‘I’m trying to make the best of it, staying busy, but there’s no straightforward path towards an ending.’

This week will mark exactly a year since Moscow-born Sorokin — in reality, the daughter of a Russian former lorry driver — was bailed for £8,000 from an ICE facility in Orange County, New York, and placed under house arrest.

She had previously been arrested in March 2021 for overstaying her visa just a month after being released from prison three years into a four-year sentence for multiple financial crimes.

While Sorokin, who still uses her ‘fake heiress’ name Anna Delvey, told the Mail last week that she ‘wouldn’t want to glorify my actions’, given the way she is using her notoriety to garner attention — and business opportunities — some might say that is exactly what she is doing.

Aside from her New York Fashion Week show, Sorokin, who is banned from using social media sites under the terms of her house arrest, has launched a podcast called The Anna Delvey Show, in which she discusses ‘preconceived notions of rule breakers’ and goes ‘beyond tired notions of what’s right and wrong’.

Fake heiress Anna 'Delvey' Sorokin was spotted taking out her trash in a full glam look in June

Fake heiress Anna ‘Delvey’ Sorokin was spotted taking out her trash in a full glam look in June

Aside from her New York Fashion Week show, Sorokin, who is banned from using social media sites under the terms of her house arrest, has launched a podcast called The Anna Delvey Show

Aside from her New York Fashion Week show, Sorokin, who is banned from using social media sites under the terms of her house arrest, has launched a podcast called The Anna Delvey Show 

In the podcast, she discusses 'preconceived notions of rule breakers' and goes 'beyond tired notions of what's right and wrong'

In the podcast, she discusses ‘preconceived notions of rule breakers’ and goes ‘beyond tired notions of what’s right and wrong’

She has even performed vocals on the podcast’s title track ‘What the hell’ with TikTok celebrity and rising country star Brooke Butler.

Earlier this year Sorokin also signed up for a reality TV show called Delvey’s Dinner Club, featuring intimate dinners at her apartment with ‘celebrities, moguls and glitterati’.

The unscripted series will depict Sorokin chatting to ‘esteemed’ guests about her criminal past, while reflecting on her reputation as a con artist and her attempts to rehabilitate her image.

She says she hopes to persuade the likes of Madonna and Elon Musk to dine at what the press release described as ‘the hottest table in town’.

She is also set to make a new documentary series which will pick up where ‘Inventing Anna’ (for which she was a paid consultant) left off.

Then there’s the art show she is planning, featuring her own creations — a collection of 12 collages and drawings rather unimaginatively called House Arrest — with price tags of up to £18,000.

‘They’re about everything I’ve been through this past year and reflecting on my experience of being confined here,’ she says.

‘I’m not a claustrophobic person by nature, but when you’re on your own a lot and always in the same space, you’re always in your own head. I’d like to get out more because it would break up the day . . . clear my head.’

This week will mark exactly a year since Moscow-born Sorokin — in reality, the daughter of a Russian former lorry driver — was bailed for £8,000 from an ICE facility in Orange County, New York, and placed under house arrest. Pictured: Anna Sorokin appears in Manhattan Civil court in March

This week will mark exactly a year since Moscow-born Sorokin — in reality, the daughter of a Russian former lorry driver — was bailed for £8,000 from an ICE facility in Orange County, New York, and placed under house arrest. Pictured: Anna Sorokin appears in Manhattan Civil court in March

Anna Sorokin, wearing an ankle monitor, and her new lawyer appear in Manhattan Civil Court

Anna Sorokin, wearing an ankle monitor, and her new lawyer appear in Manhattan Civil Court

While confined to her apartment over the past year, Sorokin has been keeping a ‘captivity’ diary which she hopes to publish.

And it’s worth mentioning her ‘Club House Arrest’ birthday party in January, invitations for which took the form of a mocked-up cover of the New York Post featuring a photograph of Delvey’s stiletto-clad feet, one of which was adorned with the ubiquitous electronic ankle tag.

Those honoured with an invitation were forced to sign non-disclosure agreements, with one guest later telling U.S. website Page Six: ‘The gimmick of going to Anna’s house is exciting right now,’ and adding: ‘The ankle monitor over the tights was chic.’

Before her fashion show venture, Sorokin joined forces with the legendary fashion PR Kelly Cutrone, a former judge on America’s Next Top Model.

Cutrone and Sorokin have now formed their own fashion PR company, the OutLaw Agency.

Their rooftop catwalk show, which saw 31 models traipse up six flights of stairs in a building without an elevator, was their first joint event.

Despite being unable to leave her apartment to attend any castings, Sorokin helped with the guest list and music, and choreographed the entire show.

Cutrone, who used to count the late British designer Vivienne Westwood among her clients, told the Mail she believes Sorokin has a bright future ahead of her — despite her past crimes.

‘I think she could easily build a $100 million business, an events empire or a fashion brand or real estate,’ says the 57-year-old.

Fake German heiress Anna Delvey returns from meeting her parole officer carrying a Wall Street Journal and dressed casual in jeans and Essentials sweatshirt with boots and her ankle monitor in January

Fake German heiress Anna Delvey returns from meeting her parole officer carrying a Wall Street Journal and dressed casual in jeans and Essentials sweatshirt with boots and her ankle monitor in January

‘She is super smart and intelligent. If she’d had better advice years ago, she could have stayed out of trouble, but she got in over her head because she was young and ambitious.’

Another who believes Sorokin has future money-spinning potential is ‘crisis PR’ guru Juda Engelmayer who has previously represented her, despite his eye-watering £27,000-a-month fee.

‘People are still interested in her,’ explains Engelmayer, who once also represented disgraced movie mogul Harvey Weinstein. ‘She’s still a sought-after commodity. A figure of curiosity. She’s got a great future ahead of her if she’s given another chance.

‘She has served her time for the trouble she caused. She’s remorseful. She was a kid when all this happened and she’s had a lot of time for self-reflection. Like everyone else in the world, she deserves a second chance.’

But not everyone believes Sorokin deserves a fresh start. For while Cutrone insists her new business partner has ‘made restitution’ and Sorokin herself told the Mail she had ‘paid everybody back in 2021 before I went to prison’, her victims beg to differ.

‘She certainly hasn’t paid me back,’ says Marc Kremers, the Paris-based founder of digital design studio, Future Corp. Sorokin swindled him out of £16,800 by pretending she was an ultra-rich heiress.

She hired Kremers to produce promotional material, including glossy brochures, which she could show to New York investment bankers. Her plan was to secure investment so she could realise her dream of opening a New York-based art gallery, the Anna Delvey Foundation.

Anna Sorokin, who claimed to be a German heiress, arrives for her trial at New York State Supreme Court in New York in April 2019

Anna Sorokin, who claimed to be a German heiress, arrives for her trial at New York State Supreme Court in New York in April 2019

‘It’s frustrating to see the narrative being rewritten like this,’ says Kremers. ‘Her story is being made to look like the American Dream. What she did, the lies she told, isn’t glamorous and sexy. She is not a good person. If she was decent, she would pay back the money she owes. I have an 11-year-old child to support.’

Sorokin, who was born in Moscow in 1991, spent three years plundering New York society, dressing in expensive designer clothes, dining at fine restaurants and helping herself to what she wanted but couldn’t afford.

She left in her wake a trail of unpaid rent, hotel and credit card bills, bounced cheques, fake wire transfers and empty promises to the ‘friends’ and associates who had loaned her money.

They believed the apparently super-wealthy Anna Delvey, who boasted of having a £55 million trust fund but often claimed her credit card wasn’t working, would easily pay them back.

She was arrested in October 2017 after one of her victims, Vanity Fair photo editor Rachel DeLoache Williams, went to the police claiming she had been swindled out of £55,000, and assisted with a subsequent sting operation.

Sorokin, she said later, had ‘an enigmatic otherness that was strangely captivating’ and ‘steel blue eyes that fixed like a snake on anything she wanted’.

Judging by recent events, Sorokin certainly hasn’t lost her touch when it comes to casting her enigmatic spell over others.

Last week, Kelly Cutrone posted footage of Anna on her way back from the ICE office in Federal Plaza. Cutrone referred to her new business partner, who was sporting a T-shirt emblazoned with the words ‘Natural Born Outlaw’ as a ‘f***ing icon’ and bragged that the pair were ‘taking pop culture back into our own hands’.

Exactly a decade on and, despite the turbulent events of recent years, there is still no sign of Sorokin's imminent deportation. Pictured: Sorokin in court in April 2019

Exactly a decade on and, despite the turbulent events of recent years, there is still no sign of Sorokin’s imminent deportation. Pictured: Sorokin in court in April 2019

Sorokin, it’s clear, hopes to portray herself as some kind of modern-day freedom fighter rather than a cheat who defrauded her victims out of thousands. Her high-profile birthday party, for example, for which she hired a PR agency, was promoted as a fund-raiser for Access Justice Brooklyn, a charity providing pro-bono legal services to those in need.

As Marc Kremers puts it: ‘She’s cultivated this ‘Robin Hood’ vibe, as if she’s some kind of anti-hero. Her crime has paid off in a way. I would love to see her deported.’

Those now placing their trust in Sorokin may also come to regret their actions. As recently as March last year, Californian-based artist Julia Morrison said she had not been repaid after putting around £7,000 of her own money into staging a ‘Free Anna’ art show in New York, featuring sketches Anna had drawn while in her prison cell.

Morrison told the Mail last year: ‘When the organisers failed to pay me back, I got in contact with Anna in prison and asked her to intervene, but she showed no empathy whatsoever.

‘Anna thought the show happened because she’s a great artist, but I did a lot of the work to make it a success.

‘Eventually she ghosted me and blocked my messages . . . I invested in Anna and wanted to help her, but I don’t think she cares about anyone except herself.’

And although New York society is apparently at her well-shod feet once again, the future for Sorokin is still uncertain.

Her lawyer, John Sandweg, says she is appealing the conditions of her house arrest before the Board of Immigration Appeals, and her case remains under review with no new hearing scheduled.

‘We are optimistic that the Board will agree that no facts exist that justify Anna’s continued confinement,’ he told the Mail.

Her former PR manager, Juda Engelmayer, adds: ‘Emotionally she keeps her spirits up. She’s painting, reading and planning her podcast — she’s always thinking about the future. People visit her and bring a bottle of wine and groceries, but when she’s alone, I think she’s sad. It wears on her.’

The truth, of course, is that Sorokin is free to leave the U.S. whenever she pleases. There is nothing to stop her returning to Germany, where she grew up with her Russian family and still holds citizenship. But disappearing back into obscurity in Europe is the last thing on her mind.

Her father, Vadim Sorokin, who runs an underfloor heating firm, told German newspaper Bild this week that ‘the worst thing that could happen to her would be that she is deported back to Germany’.

Sorokin was born during the dying days of the Soviet Union. Her father has told the Mail that he moved his family to Germany for a better life, but encountered a culture of ‘mass consumption’.

In a bid to keep up, his daughter was given the best of everything — lessons in dance, French and English and, once she reached her teenage years, the designer clothes she coveted.

In 2012, aged 21, she found work as an intern at a fashion PR agency in the German capital and became captivated by the fashion world.

She moved to Paris, where she started using the name Anna Delvey before, in 2013, travelling to the U.S. on a three-month visa to attend New York Fashion Week . . . and never left.

Exactly a decade on and, despite the turbulent events of recent years, there is still no sign of Sorokin’s imminent deportation.

And, as galling as it may be to those whom she defrauded, she looks set to achieve what she wanted all along — to become very rich indeed.


Source link

ZUVKYHCEVVF6RAZYNTZWVBMHZE.jpg

Amazon is the apex predator of our platform era

Why Lina Khan and the F.T.C. must prevail in their long-awaited lawsuit against Amazon.

FILE – Employees walk through a lobby at Amazon’s headquarters on Nov. 13, 2018, in Seattle. (AP Photo/Elaine Thompson, File)

The Federal Trade Commission’s chair, Lina Khan, has brought her long-awaited, audacious case against Amazon, signaling the Biden administration’s determination to restore an approach to competition law that has been in decline since the Carter administration. This will doubtless draw fresh criticism about her supposed overreach. But Amazon is precisely the kind of company that Congress had in mind in enacting America’s many antitrust laws.

Only more so: The Congress of 1890, which passed the first of those laws, could never have imagined the world we now inhabit.

The robber barons of that era hijacked the economy and politics, but they also faced the constraints of empires grounded in physical goods. They couldn’t lay a railroad or erect a steel mill without time-consuming capital and logistical hurdles. Today’s tech barons at huge platforms like Amazon, Google and Meta can deploy anticompetitive, deceptive and unfair tactics with the agility and speed of a digital system. As in any shell game, the quickness of the hand deceives the eye.

And Amazon is the apex predator of our platform era. Having first subsidized end-users, and then offered favorable terms to business customers, Amazon was able to exploit its digital flexibility to lock both in and raid them for an ever-increasing share of the value they created. This program of redistribution from platform users to shareholders continued until Amazon has become a vestigial place, a retail colossus barely hindered by either competition or regulation, where prices go up as quality goes down, and the undifferentiated slurry of products from obscure brands is wreathed in inauthentic reviews.

It’s hard to remember that the internet was originally supposed to connect producers and shoppers, artists and audiences, and members of communities with one another without permission or control by third parties. In its early years, Amazon was good to its users. It sold products affordably, and shipped them swiftly and reliably. It attended closely to the authenticity of the reviews that appeared on its site and operated an “honest search” that populated results pages with the best matches for each query.

Then Amazon started locking everyone in. Through Prime, it presold customers a year’s worth of shipping. With its digital publishing ventures, it nudged customers toward subscriptions, building a captive base of readers and deploying technology and expansive readings of obscure copyright laws to stop them from moving their books to other platforms. It opened Prime shipping at a low rate to its suppliers, relieving businesses of messy fulfillment logistics.

Meanwhile, its heavy subsidies, made possible by its investors’ appetite for backing an incipient monopoly, made it increasingly difficult for rival retail sites to gain traction, because Amazon’s seemingly bottomless coffers meant that it could sell goods below cost and extinguish any upstart that dared to compete with it. This created another form of lock-in for Amazon: It became progressively harder not to shop there.

The more locked in we were, the less Amazon needed to offer us. The customer-friendly, honest search degraded as the company began to allow retailers to buy their way to the top of listings, and by 2021, ads generated $31 billion in revenue. As sellers became increasingly reliant upon Amazon to display and deliver their goods, the company was free to drain money from them, too, piling fee upon fee and reportedly copying best-selling products.

Amazon’s army of workers also suffered: They are routinely maimed on the job, and on-site infirmaries send badly injured workers back into harm’s way. Its warehouse workers urinate in bottles to keep up with impossibly high fulfillment demands; its drivers are forced to defecate in bags. Amazon pioneered the “megacycle,” a 10.5-hour, mandatory graveyard shift at its warehouses, as well as a new kind of arm’s-length quasi entrepreneur who borrows small fortunes and hires legions of drivers kitted out in Amazon livery, only to be stuck with the bill for all those delivery vans — and risk termination at any moment.

Now we are at the final stage of monopolistic decay. The nation’s dominant online retail marketplace not only claws away much of its sellers’ revenues but also now penalizes them if they sell their products for lower prices at other retail outlets (including at its archrivals Target and Walmart). Amazon gets the American consumer coming and going, providing worse goods at higher prices while receiving vast sums in subsidies from state and local governments.

Speaking for his landmark antitrust bill of 1890, Sen. John Sherman said: “If we will not endure a king as a political power, we should not endure a king over the production, transportation and sale of any of the necessaries of life. If we would not submit to an emperor we should not submit to an autocrat of trade.”

This suspicion of corporate power died in the Reagan era, when regulators adopted a new posture grounded in the idea that monopolies were evidence of efficiency and should be nurtured, and that “consumer welfare” in the form of low prices was an absolute good of antitrust law. Amazon is surely the king of our time. Our antitrust laws were fashioned specifically to guard against this overwhelming corporate power — both its accumulation and its abuse.

This is something Ms. Khan, the F.T.C. chair, understands better than almost anyone: As a law student, she published “Amazon’s Antitrust Paradox” in The Yale Law Journal in 2017. That article launched her career as an antitrust theorist, culminating in her elevation to the trade commission just four years later. Ironically, Ms. Khan’s deep expertise on Amazon and past criticism prompted the company to seek her recusal from antitrust investigations.

Ms. Khan has taken aim at some of the largest tech companies the world has ever seen. Sometimes, she loses. The F.T.C. failed to block Microsoft’s acquisition of Activision Blizzard and Meta’s acquisition of Within. Ms. Khan’s detractors then smear her with claims of gamesmanship and insincerity. But she is engaged in the honorable and necessary business of restoring the enforcement program of the federal government. She seeks to reinvigorate the use of the longstanding — and long-dormant — powers she already has.

The best time to have fought this power was over the past quarter-century, as Amazon’s founder, Jeff Bezos, used his shareholders’ capital on predatory pricing campaigns, seemingly in plain violation of the Robinson-Patman Act of 1936, and on a string of anticompetitive acquisitions that surely violated the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914.

The second best time to fight this power is now. Ms. Khan, who is joined by over a dozen states in taking on Amazon, has set herself a monumental, urgent, necessary task. She is fighting to win — but if she loses again, it will not signal defeat.

The calcified edifice of expensively purchased pro-monopoly precedent is hard, but it appears brittle. With our support, Ms. Khan — and her colleagues on the commission as well as Jonathan Kanter, her opposite number at the Justice Department’s antitrust division — will continue to hammer away at this yellowing old shell until it shatters.

Cory Doctorow is the author of the newsletter Pluralistic and of “The Internet Con: How to Seize the Means of Computation.” This article originally appeared in The New York Times.


Source link

Best-Horror-Movies-on-Netflix.jpg

The 11 Best Horror Movies on Netflix: October 2023

Boo! It’s October 1, which means it’s officially spooky season for the next 30 days. And what better way to celebrate the start of spooky season than by watching horror movies on Netflix?

In years past, Netflix has treated subscribers to a month of one new original horror movie a week. The streamer isn’t doing that this year, but there are still plenty of other horror movies in the Netflix library. That includes genre films from Guillermo del Toro, slasher franchises like Fear Street, and psychological thrillers like The Perfection. No matter how tough you are, we guarantee there’s a movie on this list that will scare you.

  • Crimson Peak Romance
    Photos: Everett Collection ; Illustration: Dillen Phelps

    Director Guillermo del Toro knows how to make viewers both horny and scared. Mia Wasikowska stars as a young woman who goes to stay with an eccentric baronet (Tom Hiddleston) and his equally off-putting sister (Jessica Chastain). This is a true ghost story with impeccable vibes, that is sure to get you in the mood for spooky season.

  • THE INVITATION 2022 NETFLIX REVIEW
    Photo: Everett Collection

    Directed by Jessica M. Thompson and written by Blair Butler, this 2022 horror movie is a fresh take on Bram Stroker’s Dracula novel. Nathalie Emmanuel stars as a struggling artist who takes a DNA test and discovers that she has a rich cousin in England. Not only that but said rich cousin also has a rich friend who is totally into her. It’s every starving artist’s dream come true… right? Too bad about that whole vampire thing.

  • In the Tall Grass Avery Whitted
    Netflix

    Directed and adapted by Vincenzo Natali, In the Tall Grass is a scary, disturbing, horrific film adaptation of a 2012 short story from Stephen King. Laysla De Oliveira and Avery Whitted star as two siblings, Becky and Cal, who are lured to a field of grass (tall grass) when they hear a little boy named Tobin (Will Buie Jr.) crying for help. This is no ordinary grass, however—this is evil grass. In the Tall Grass is full of twists and disturbing imagery, and ties it all up with satisfying emotional arcs for its characters. It’s a must-watch for fans of horror and King alike.

  • Fear Street Part 1
    Photo: Everett Collection

     Fear Street Part 1: 1994 on Netflix is not only a fun, gory, R-rated adaptation of the R.L. Stine book series, it’s also a super cute lesbian love story. The very charming Kiana Madeira stars as a teen girl in the ’90s named Deena, who recently broke up with her girlfriend Sam (Olivia Welch), after Sam transferred from the downtrodden Shadyside High to their affluent rivals, Sunnyvale. But soon the girls have more to worry about than drama and rivalries when a masked killer starts terrorizing their friends. Director Leigh Janiak manages to make Fear Street a fun, nostalgic throwback for ’90s kids that will also no doubt appeal to the horror-loving subset of Gen Z.

  • FEAR STREET PART 2: 1978
    Photo: Netflix

    After you finish the first Fear Street movie, you might as well follow it up with the sequel. Clearly drawing inspiration from—and improving on—’80s horror flicks like Friday the 13th, this second installment is fun, gory, and surprisingly romantic. It’s also even better than the already solid first entry in the trilogy. Stranger Things star Sadie Sink shines as Ziggy, an angry teenager from the downtrodden city of Shadyside who can’t understand her sister Cindy’s positive outlook on life. But when a murderer starts terrorizing their summer camp, the girls must set aside their differences and work together. Fair warning: this smart, funny, sexy, and gory slasher earns its R-rating, and may not be for the faint of heart.

  • Fear Street Part 3
    Photo: Netflix

    You’ve made it this far, so you may as well watch the third and final film in the Fear Street series.  Fear Street: 1666 is a satisfying ending to this fun, fresh, R-rated horror trilogy. In particular, the 1666 section of the movie—which finally gave viewers the chilling origin story of the Shadyside witch, Sarah Fier—delivered impeccable colonial horror vibes and kept the suspense alive. Also, like the first film, it’s very gay. The queer teens don’t know how good they have it these days!

  • UMMA, Sandra Oh, 2022
    Photo: ©Sony Pictures/Courtesy Everett Collection

    Sandra Oh as a scream queen? Don’t mind if I do! This 2022 supernatural thriller from writer/director Iris K. Shim stars Oh as a single mother, who lives with her daughter in an isolated farmhouse. That might be a fine existence if it weren’t for the ghost of Oh’s mother who keeps haunting them. Umma was also produced by Sam Raimi, the man behind the best Spider-Man films, if that sweetens the deal for ya.

  • Annihilation ending explained
    ©Paramount/Courtesy Everett Collection / Everett Collection

    Yes, Annihilation is a horror movie, and no, I won’t be taking questions at this time. Filmmaker Alex Garland, who adapted the novel by Jeff VanderMeer, delivered impeccable vibes: Luscious green forests full of terrifying monsters, delicate flowers that can literally kill you, and that iconic soundtrack that never fails to send a chill down my spine. And this is the rare sci-fi movie that offers not just one, not just two, but five great roles for women—Natalie Portman, Jennifer Jason Leigh, Gina Rodriguez, Tessa Thompson, and Tuva Novotny as a team of soldier-scientists—and they all crush it. And yes, the ending is confusing, but if you really pay attention, it does make sense.

  • Allison Williams in The Perfection
    Photo: Netflix

    This psychological thriller from director Richard Shepard cemented Allison Williams’s place as a twisted scream queen. Williams stars as Charlotte, a former child prodigy on the cello who was forced to drop out of her prestigious music conservatory when her mother fell ill. After her mother dies, she seeks out her old mentor Anton (Steven Weber), and discovers he has a new favorite student named Lizzie (Logan Browning). Immediately, Charlotte and Lizzie fall into an intense sexual relationship. In lieu of spoilers, let’s just say that two women end up in a horrific situation, orchestrated by Charlotte out of jealousy. It’s not a perfect film (pun intended), but it features disturbing visuals you’ll never forget.

  • Russell Crowe possessed by a demon, screaming, with a distorted jaw, in The Pope's Exorcist
    Photo: Sony Pictures

    Directed by Julius Avery, this 2023 supernatural horror flick stars Russell Crowe as “the James Bond of exorcists,” aka Father Gabriele Amorth. To say The Pope’s Exorcist is “based on a true story” would be a stretch, but it is based on the memoirs of the real-life priest, Father Gabriele Amorth, who worked as an official exorcist for the Catholic Church from 1986 until his death in 2016. The late William Friedkin, director of The Exorcist, even made a documentary about him back in 2018 called The Devil and Father Amorth. If you want to choose to believe, in the spirit of spooky season, we won’t tell.

  • Sandra Bullock in 'Bird Box'
    Photo: Netflix

    This surprise break-out hit for Netflix, directed by Susanne Bier, is pure genre fun. The great Sandra Bullock stars as a tough-as-nails lone wolf trying to survive in a post-apocalyptic world overrun by mysterious monsters. One look at these monsters will drive you insane, so survivors are forced to wear blindfolds outside. It’s not exactly elevated horror, but it is a creative, original, and fun monster movie. Plus, Sandra Bullock!




  • Source link

    36cf1be9dbea39302b03977486efcb83.jpg

    Netflix’s Tomb Raider Will Show Lara Croft’s Journey from S…

    During its “Drop 01″ livestream event, Netflix unveiled the first official look at its Tomb Raider anime, The Legend of Lara Croft. The show was originally announced back in 2021 and marks the first new piece of Tomb Raider media since the 2018 reboot movie starring Alicia Vikander.

    Set in the same continuity as Crystal Dynamics’ Survivor trilogy of games—which encompassed the titular 2013 reboot, Rise of the Tomb Raider, and Shadow of the Tomb Raider—the series from Castlevania studio Powerhouse Animation stars Haley Atwell as that continuity’s version of Lara Croft. While plot details are currently under wraps, the big thing worth knowing is that Lara appears to be raiding tombs and ends up getting involved in something supernatural that’ll require her to set things right before the world becomes endangered. Like her video game counterpart, this Lara has the only two friends she’s ever truly needed: a pickaxe for climbing and a bow and arrow for silent kills.

    Legend of Lara Croft isn’t the only piece of Tomb Raider media in the works. Earlier in the year, Amazon locked in Fleabag’s Phoebe Waller-Bridge to create a live-action TV show based on the games, and one that’s seemingly separate from this. At the same time, it’s also been reported that her show is meant to kick off a larger Tomb Raider universe that’ll include a new movie, which presently has no director or actor attached. Both the show and the eventual movie are intended to link up with the next entry from Crystal Dynamics, which is going to be published by Amazon Games.

    First though, we’ve got Tomb Raider: The Legend of Lara Croft—which is set to hit Netflix sometime in 2024.


    Want more entertainment news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and DC releases, what’s coming to cinemas in Australia this year, and everything streaming this month across all platforms. Check out our dedicated Entertainment tab for more.




    Source link

    ahmed-el-sakka-1696092375-0.jpg

    Ahmed El Sakka-led Series “Al Gawla Al Akhera” Lands at Ama…


    Sat 30 Sep 2023 | 07:46 PM

    Egyptian actor Ahmed El Sakka is making his streaming debut with the TV series “Al Gawla Al Akhera” (The Last Round).

    It is set to debut on Amazon Prime Video, becoming the first Arab series to stream on the VOD streaming service.

    The cast also includes Ashraf Abdel Baky, Asma Abulyazeid, Safaa El-Toukhi, Sahar Ramy, Hanan Sulieman, Aly Sobhy, and others. It also features Hanan Motawie making a guest appearance on the series.

    The series consists of eight episodes and hails from director Mariam Ahmady and scriptwriters Mohamed Nada and Mohamed Al-Shakhabi.

    “Al Gawla Al Akhera” is centered around a doctor named Yahya, played by El Sakka, who studied to become a doctor under pressure from his father, however, he still hopes to achieve his dream.

    Principal photography is underway.

    Ahmed El Sakka

    El Sakka, born on March 1, 1973, is an Egyptian actor. He graduated from the Academy of Arts.

    He began his acting career with appearances in Egyptian mini-series and ended up co-starring in many famed Ramadan series.

    Early in his career, El Sakka appeared in popular series such as “Nesf Rabeea El-Akhar”, “Nsf Rbye Alakhar”, “Wamin Aldhy la Yuhibu Fatma?”, “Tarwid Alsharisa”, “Helm El Ganouby”, and “Zayzinia S1”.

    He established himself as an actor in 1998 when he co-starred in the film “Saeedi Fil Gamaa El Amrekeia” (Saeedi in the American University).

    In 2000, the actor received his first leading film role in “Short wi Fanila wi Cap” (Short, T-Shirt and Cap). 

    ads


    Source link

    netflix-inc-logo.jpg

    Kercheville Advisors LLC Raises Holdings in Netflix, Inc. (…

    Kercheville Advisors LLC grew its position in Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ:NFLX – Free Report) by 9.2% in the 2nd quarter, according to its most recent 13F filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The firm owned 9,650 shares of the Internet television network’s stock after buying an additional 815 shares during the quarter. Netflix accounts for 2.6% of Kercheville Advisors LLC’s holdings, making the stock its 15th largest holding. Kercheville Advisors LLC’s holdings in Netflix were worth $4,251,000 at the end of the most recent quarter.

    Several other hedge funds have also made changes to their positions in NFLX. Fulton Breakefield Broenniman LLC raised its position in shares of Netflix by 3.8% in the 2nd quarter. Fulton Breakefield Broenniman LLC now owns 686 shares of the Internet television network’s stock worth $302,000 after acquiring an additional 25 shares in the last quarter. Cedar Brook Financial Partners LLC raised its position in shares of Netflix by 3.6% in the 2nd quarter. Cedar Brook Financial Partners LLC now owns 748 shares of the Internet television network’s stock worth $329,000 after acquiring an additional 26 shares in the last quarter. Five Oceans Advisors raised its position in shares of Netflix by 0.9% in the 2nd quarter. Five Oceans Advisors now owns 2,771 shares of the Internet television network’s stock worth $1,220,000 after acquiring an additional 26 shares in the last quarter. Dudley Capital Management LLC raised its position in shares of Netflix by 2.0% in the 1st quarter. Dudley Capital Management LLC now owns 1,551 shares of the Internet television network’s stock worth $536,000 after acquiring an additional 30 shares in the last quarter. Finally, Retirement Group LLC raised its position in shares of Netflix by 52.6% in the 1st quarter. Retirement Group LLC now owns 87 shares of the Internet television network’s stock worth $30,000 after acquiring an additional 30 shares in the last quarter. 79.95% of the stock is currently owned by hedge funds and other institutional investors.

    Insider Transactions at Netflix

    In other news, Director Jay C. Hoag sold 943 shares of Netflix stock in a transaction that occurred on Thursday, July 13th. The stock was sold at an average price of $450.00, for a total value of $424,350.00. Following the sale, the director now directly owns 421,491 shares of the company’s stock, valued at $189,670,950. The sale was disclosed in a filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission, which is accessible through this hyperlink. In other news, Director Jay C. Hoag sold 943 shares of Netflix stock in a transaction that occurred on Thursday, July 13th. The stock was sold at an average price of $450.00, for a total value of $424,350.00. Following the sale, the director now directly owns 421,491 shares of the company’s stock, valued at $189,670,950. The sale was disclosed in a filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission, which is accessible through this hyperlink. Also, Director Timothy M. Haley sold 1,022 shares of Netflix stock in a transaction that occurred on Wednesday, July 5th. The stock was sold at an average price of $450.19, for a total value of $460,094.18. The disclosure for this sale can be found here. Insiders have sold 125,377 shares of company stock valued at $54,547,674 over the last ninety days. Insiders own 2.45% of the company’s stock.

    Analysts Set New Price Targets

    Want More Great Investing Ideas?

    Several research analysts have recently commented on the company. Canaccord Genuity Group boosted their price target on Netflix from $470.00 to $525.00 and gave the stock a “buy” rating in a research report on Thursday, July 20th. Truist Financial reaffirmed a “hold” rating and set a $485.00 target price on shares of Netflix in a research report on Friday, September 15th. Wells Fargo & Company reaffirmed an “overweight” rating and set a $500.00 target price on shares of Netflix in a research report on Thursday, July 20th. Piper Sandler upped their target price on Netflix from $350.00 to $440.00 in a research report on Thursday, July 20th. Finally, Jefferies Financial Group upped their target price on Netflix from $440.00 to $520.00 in a research report on Tuesday, July 18th. Two research analysts have rated the stock with a sell rating, thirteen have given a hold rating and twenty-three have assigned a buy rating to the company. Based on data from MarketBeat.com, the stock currently has an average rating of “Moderate Buy” and an average target price of $433.06.

    Read Our Latest Stock Report on Netflix

    Netflix Price Performance

    NFLX traded up $1.24 during trading on Friday, hitting $377.60. The company’s stock had a trading volume of 4,205,298 shares, compared to its average volume of 4,805,641. The company has a current ratio of 1.33, a quick ratio of 1.33 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.62. Netflix, Inc. has a twelve month low of $211.73 and a twelve month high of $485.00. The business’s fifty day simple moving average is $417.93 and its 200 day simple moving average is $388.94. The firm has a market capitalization of $167.33 billion, a price-to-earnings ratio of 40.21, a P/E/G ratio of 1.25 and a beta of 1.29.

    Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX – Get Free Report) last issued its quarterly earnings data on Wednesday, July 19th. The Internet television network reported $3.29 EPS for the quarter, beating the consensus estimate of $2.85 by $0.44. Netflix had a return on equity of 19.76% and a net margin of 13.22%. The company had revenue of $8.19 billion for the quarter, compared to analyst estimates of $8.29 billion. During the same period last year, the company earned $3.20 earnings per share. Netflix’s quarterly revenue was up 2.7% compared to the same quarter last year. On average, equities research analysts forecast that Netflix, Inc. will post 11.91 EPS for the current fiscal year.

    Netflix Profile

    (Free Report)

    Netflix, Inc provides entertainment services. It offers TV series, documentaries, feature films, and mobile games across various genres and languages. The company provides members the ability to receive streaming content through a host of internet-connected devices, including TVs, digital video players, television set-top boxes, and mobile devices.

    Featured Articles

    Want to see what other hedge funds are holding NFLX? Visit HoldingsChannel.com to get the latest 13F filings and insider trades for Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ:NFLX – Free Report).

    Institutional Ownership by Quarter for Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX)

    Receive News & Ratings for Netflix Daily – Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts’ ratings for Netflix and related companies with MarketBeat.com’s FREE daily email newsletter.


    Source link